<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/</link>
	<description>amateur photography blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ibelchi.com &#187; Primera foto amb el Canon 50mm f/1.8 II</title>
		<link>http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>ibelchi.com &#187; Primera foto amb el Canon 50mm f/1.8 II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] Reviews de l&#8217;objectiu The Digital Picture Fredmiranda theapblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reviews de l&#8217;objectiu The Digital Picture Fredmiranda theapblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Styr</title>
		<link>http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Styr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I think at this quality level, the Quality Control is not very good, and the copies seem to vary hugely, as mine definitely isn&#039;t sharpest at f/2.8 or f/3, so you got a good copy there!!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Charlie -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I think at this quality level, the Quality Control is not very good, and the copies seem to vary hugely, as mine definitely isn&#8217;t sharpest at f/2.8 or f/3, so you got a good copy there!!!</p>
<p>Charlie -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCQ</title>
		<link>http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>JCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theapblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/review-canon-ef-50mm-f18-ii/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I did some tests and found that mine is sharpest at f/2.8 and f/3 (wider than I expected), so it seems they vary considerably between copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some tests and found that mine is sharpest at f/2.8 and f/3 (wider than I expected), so it seems they vary considerably between copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
